Section
13 of the PVAT Act, 2005 provides for the entitlement of Input Tax Credit on
the purchases made by a Taxable Person subject to such Conditions as may be
prescribed. However when a person uses taxable goods for the production of both
taxable and tax free goods Section 13(5) & Rules 23 & 24 of the PVAT
Rules, 2005 comes into play. The word USE is of prime importance and the
availability of the Input Tax Credit on full basis or on proportionate bases
depends on use of raw material. The Excise & Taxation Department, Punjab
without actually understanding the true sense of these sections is disallowing
the Input Tax Credit on the raw material qua Tax Free goods on basis of Rule 23
& 24 of the Punjab VAT Rules, 2005. Relevant portion of Section 13 (1)
& 13(5) are reproduced as under:
“Section
13(1) A taxable person shall be entitled to the input tax credit, in
such manner and subject to such conditions, as may be prescribed, in respect of
input tax on taxable goods, including capital goods, purchased by him from a
taxable person within the State during the tax period:
Provided
that such goods are for sale in the State or in the course of inter-State trade
or commerce or in the course of export or for use in the manufacture,
processing or packing of taxable goods for sale within the State or in the
course of inter-State trade or commerce or in the course of export:
Provided
further that a taxable person shall be entitled to partial input tax credit in
any other event, as may be provided in this section in such manner and subject
to such conditions as may be prescribed:
Provided
further that if, purchases are used partially for the purposes specified in
this sub-section and the taxable person is unable to identify the goods used
for such purposes, then the input tax credit shall be allowed proportionate to
the extent, these are used for such purposes, in the prescribed manner:
xxx”
Section 13(5) A taxable person under this section, shall not qualify for
input tax credit in respect of the tax paid on purchase of, –
(h)
goods used in manufacture, processing or packing of goods
specified in Schedule ‘A’;”
Rule
23 of the Punjab VAT Rules, 2005 provides for the availability of Input Tax
Credit where identification of goods is possible whereas Rule 24 provides for
the availability of Input Tax Credit where identification of goods is not possible.”
The
word USE here show the control or willingness of a person to use the raw
material according to his wish for the production of taxable or tax free goods.
Where the person has authority over the quantity and can decide the amount of
raw material to be used in production of taxable or tax free goods there the
Principle of Apportionment can be applied and proportionate Input Tax Credit
can be given but where he does not have the control over the raw material used
for the purpose of taxable or tax free goods i.e. in case of Composite
Production where he cannot control the quantity at his own will no Input Tax
Credit can be disallowed on proportionate basis.
Let’s understand this with examples:
Let us take case of a Publisher
A publisher of books/notebooks by using paper can produce
books, periodicals, Journals which are tax free and can also produce other
stationary items like exercise books, graph books which are taxable. Now it is
upon his will or under his control that he can use 100 rims of paper for the
production of books/ note books and 50 rims of paper for production of other
taxable items or vice-versa or any other quantity which he may decide. Here he
has the choice to use these goods in the manner he wants. He has the control
over the quantity of the raw material used in the production of taxable goods
and tax free goods. Here Input Tax is to be allowed proportionately depending
upon the quantity used by him.
Now let us take the case of Rice Sheller:
A Rice Sheller shells paddy to produce Rice and along with
it Phak, Rice Husk, Nakuu & Kinki are also produced. Here he has no control
over the raw material which has gone into the production of Rice. He cannot
choose certain quantity of paddy of only producing Rice and some quantity of
Paddy for production of tax free goods. It is a composite production where each
stick of paddy has gone into the production of Rice which is taxable and Phak,
Rice husk and other products which are tax free. Here he has no choice to use
these goods in the manner he wants. He has no control over the quantity of the
raw material used in the production of taxable goods and tax free goods. Here
no Input Tax Credit can be disallowed on proportionate basis. He is entitled to
full amount of Input Tax paid on the raw material used.
Similar
is the case with the Sugar Industry where Sugar is tax free and Molasses
& Bagasse are Taxable.
In
case of Composite production of taxable and tax free goods no Input Tax Credit
can be disallowed on proportionate basis. Where the person has no option or
cannot use the raw material at his will Section 13(5) & Rule 23 & 24
are not applicable there.
Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India in case of Bharat Petroleum wherein Kerosene Oil
was produced by Refining of Crude Oil with the help of Sulphuric Acid. Kerosene
and Acid Sludge were produced. Kerosene was not taxable and Acid Sludge was
sold as taxable commodity. The Department was disallowing set-off qua Kerosene
Oil and was only allowing set-off to the extent of Acid Sludge sold. Here the
Hon’ble Apex Court held that in the Composite production of Kerosene and Acid
Sludge full amount of Set-off on the tax paid on Sulphuric Acid will be
allowed.
Similar
view was taken by Madhya Pradesh High Court following the judgment of Hon’ble
Supreme Court where in in the manufacture of taxable Edible Oil tax free
De-Oiled Cake was also produced. The Hon’ble Court held that the petitioner is
entitled to full amount of set-off as it was a composite production of both
taxable and tax free goods and authority cannot apportion the tax liability
after deducting the percentage of raw material used for production of De-Oiled
cake.
Karnataka
High Court also took the same view in case of M.K. Agro Tech (P) Ltd Vs State
of Karnataka and allowed full amount of Input Tax Credit on the raw material in
case of composite production of both taxable and tax free goods.
So
on the basis of the these judgments no Input Tax Credit can be disallowed where
there is a composite production of taxable as well as tax free goods. Need of
the hour is to understand the true sense of the Section 13 and the Rules made
there under as interpreted by the Hon’ble Courts so as to give them proper
applicability in the interest of general public.
No comments:
Post a Comment