Instruction No. 08/2015
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue (CBDT)
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue (CBDT)
North-Block, IT (A-II) Division, New Delhi
Dated- 31st of August, 2015
To
All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax
All Pr. Directors-General of Income-tax/Directors-General of Income-tax
All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax
All Pr. Directors-General of Income-tax/Directors-General of Income-tax
Sir/Madam
Subject: Compulsory manual selection
of cases for scrutiny during the Financial Year 2015-2016-regd:-
1. In supersession of earlier
Instructions on the above subject, the Board hereby lays down the following
procedure and criteria for manual selection of returns/cases for scrutiny
during the financial-year 2015-2016:-
(a) Cases involving addition in an
earlier assessment year in excess of Rs. 10 lakhs on a substantial and
recurring question of law or fact which is either confirmed in appeal or is
pending before an appellate authority.
(b) Cases involving addition in an
earlier assessment year on the issue of transfer pricing in excess of Rs. 10
crore or more on a substantial and recurring question of law or fact which is
either confirmed in appeal or is pending before an appellate authority.
(c) All assessments pertaining to
Survey under section 133A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) excluding those cases
where books of accounts, documents etc. were not impounded and returned income
(excluding any disclosure made during the Survey) is not less than returned
income of preceding assessment year. However, where assessee retracts the
disclosure made during the Survey, such cases will not be covered by this
exclusion.
(d) Assessments in search and
seizure cases to be made under section(s) 158B, 158BC, 158BD, 153A & 153C
read with section 143(3) of the Act and also for the returns filed for the
assessment year relevant to the previous year in which authorization for search
and seizure was executed u/s 132 or 132A of the Act.
(e) Returns filed in response to
notice under section 148 of the Act.
(f) Cases where registration u/s
12AA of the IT Act has not been granted or has been cancelled by the CIT/DIT
concerned, yet the assessee has been found to be claiming tax-exemption under
section 11 of the Act. However, where such orders of the CIT/DIT have been
reversed/set-aside in appellate proceedings, those cases will not be selected
under this clause.
(g) Cases where the approval already
granted u/s 10(23C)/35(1)(ii)/35(1)(iii)/10(46) of the Act has been withdrawn
by the Competent Authority, yet the assessee has been found claiming
tax-exemption/benefit under the aforesaid provisions.
(h) Cases in respect of which
specific and verifiable information pointing out tax-evasion is given by
Government Departments/Authorities. The Assessing Officer shall record reasons
and take prior approval from jurisdictional Pr. CCIT/CCIT/Pr. DGIT/DGIT
concerned before selecting such a case for scrutiny.
2. Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection
(CASS): Cases are also being selected under CASS on the basis of broad based
selection filters. List of such cases shall be separately intimated in due
course by the Pr.DGIT(Systems) to the jurisdictional authorities concerned.
3. It is reiterated that the targets for completion of
scrutiny assessments and strategy of framing quality assessments as contained
in Central Action Plan document for Financial-Year 2015-2016 have to be
complied with and it must be ensured that all scrutiny assessment orders
including the cases selected under the manual criterion are completed through
the AST system software only. Further, in order to ensure the quality of assessments
being framed, Pr. CCsiT/CCsiT/Pr. DsGIT/DsGIT should evolve a suitable
monitoring mechanism and by 30th April, 2016, such authorities shall send a
report to the respective Zonal Member with a copy to Member (IT) containing
details of at least 50 quality assessment orders from their respective charges.
In this regard, IT Authorities concerned must ensure that cases selected for
publication in ‘Let us Share’ are picked up only from the quality assessments
as reported.
4. These instructions may be brought to the notice of all
concerned.
5. Hindi version to follow.
(Rohit
Garg)
Deputy-Secretary to the Government of India
Deputy-Secretary to the Government of India
F. No.
225/201/2015/ITA.II
No comments:
Post a Comment