Citation of the case: M/S. Southern Travels vs The Assistant Commissioner
(Madras High Court), Tax Case (Appeal) Number-758 of 2007, Date of
decision-20-01-2015
Brief facts of the case: The appellant is engaged In the
business of plying taxis and letting out heavy equipments. The appellant has
filed a ‘NIL’ return for assessment year 1999-2000 after setting carry forward depreciation
loss under section 32(2) of the income tax act relating to the assessment years
1995-96 and 1997-98 and business loss under section 72 relating to assessment
year 1997-98.
While
doing assessment under sec 143(3) of the income tax act,AO has reduced the
carry forward loss for setting off under sec 72 and 32(2) of the IT act.
AO
initiated the re-assessment proceedings under sec 147 of the income tax act by
issuing notice Dt 23-03-2001 under sec 148 on the ground that the carry forward
unabsorbed depreciation cannot be set off against short term capital gains
arising on sale of business assets and rejected the claim of the assessee .
Assessee
filed an appeal against an order of AO to CIT(A) who also answered against
assessee. Aggrieved form the decision of CIT(A) ,assessee file an appeal with
ITAT,whose bench also ordered against assessee.
Contention of the assessee: Assessee contended that the
capital gain has arisen on the sale of the depreciable business assets which
are used for the running of business and earning of income ,So the gain on the
sale of the same should be treated under head” profits and gains from business
and profession” though the profit on sale of depreciable assets was taxed under
short term capital gains by the deeming provision of section 50 of the income
Tax act.He also stated that the section 50 does not state the capital gain on sale
of assets but provides for withdrawal of depreciation already allowed on
depreciable asset at the time of sale.So the capital gain on the sale of
depreciable asset should be adjusted against carry forward of unabsorbed
depreciation and there is no escaping of income in doing that.
Assessee
has also given reference of the decision of supreme court in CIT V/s Cocanada
Radhaswami Bank Limited (57 ITR 306) and CIT Vs ramaanth Goenka where in it is
decided that the carry forward depreciation loss needs to be adjusted against
short term capital gains arising out on sale of business assets.
Contention of revenue: Respondent argued that the capital gain on sale of
depreciable asset should be taxed under head income from capital gains so there
is escaping of income on the assessee side and the cannot be set off against
carry forward unabsorbed depreciation.
Held by respective court: Hon’ble High Court relied on the
decision of Cocanada reported in 57 ITR 306 and Sasoon V/s CIT in which it was
held that carry forward unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against the
capital gain from sale of depreciable asset. So the Hon’high court remanded the
matter back to the tribunal to consider and pass orders on the entire issues
raised by the assessee. Accordingly the order of tribunal stands set aside .
No comments:
Post a Comment